A8-6410 vs Celeron G1840

A8-6410 vs Celeron G1840 Performance Spectrum

A8-6410

4 / 4

1,772

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G1840

2 / 2

1,784

+0.7%

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-6410 vs Celeron G1840 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-6410 vs Celeron G1840: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-6410

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,772 vs 1,784).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 51.0 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Celeron G1840

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $65 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 187.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.0 vs 17.7 PassMark/$ ($35 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1840 better than A8-6410?

Yes. Celeron G1840 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1840 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1840 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1840 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1840 comes in $65 cheaper on MSRP at $35 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 187.6% better value on MSRP (51.0 vs 17.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1840 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A8-6410 vs Celeron G1840 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-6410

The A8-6410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,772 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron G1840

The Celeron G1840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,784 points. Launch price was $53.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-6410 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G1840 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-6410 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A8-6410 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1840 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G1840 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A8-6410 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G1840 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6410 scores 1,772 against the Celeron G1840's 1,784 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron G1840.

Feature	A8-6410	Celeron G1840
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.8 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Beema (2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,772	1,784
Geekbench 6 Single	—	488
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	832

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6410 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1840 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6410 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1840 — the A8-6410 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1840 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A8-6410) vs 2 (Celeron G1840). PCIe lanes: 4 (A8-6410) vs 16 (Celeron G1840) — the Celeron G1840 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT3b (A8-6410) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1840).

Feature	A8-6410	Celeron G1840
Socket	FT3	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1866+40%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-6410) vs VT-x (Celeron G1840). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 Graphics (A8-6410) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1840) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-6410 rivals Pentium N3530; Celeron G1840 rivals Pentium G3240.

Feature	A8-6410	Celeron G1840
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R5 Graphics	HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A8-6410 was priced at $100, while the Celeron G1840 came in at $35. On launch pricing ($100 vs $35), Celeron G1840 was $65 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-6410 delivers 17.7 pts/$ vs 51.0 pts/$ for the Celeron G1840 — making the Celeron G1840 the 96.8% better value option.

Feature	A8-6410	Celeron G1840
MSRP	$100	$35-65%
Performance per Dollar	17.7	51.0+188%
Release Date	2014	2014

Search A8-6410 on Amazon

Search Celeron G1840 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.