A8-6410
VS
Celeron G1840

A8-6410 vs Celeron G1840

AMD

A8-6410

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron G1840

2 Cores2 Thrd50 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-6410 is positioned at rank 928 and the Celeron G1840 is on rank 420, so the Celeron G1840 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-6410

#916
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1656%
#917
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1631%
#918
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1498%
#919
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1491%
#920
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1477%
#922
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1427%
#923
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1368%
#924
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1366%
#925
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1329%
#928
A8-6410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
100%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
96%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1840

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6116%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5779%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4196%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1264%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1001%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
876%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
502%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
495%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
451%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
451%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
446%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
434%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
428%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
426%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
422%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
99%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
97%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
96%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
96%
#420
Celeron G1840
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
100%
#421
Core i5-8400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $95
99%
#423
Phenom II X3 705e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $69
99%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
98%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
98%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
96%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron G1840 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A8-6410 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA8-6410Celeron G1840
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron G1840 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 25% cheaper ($30 vs $40) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightA8-6410Celeron G1840
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+34%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-6410 and Celeron G1840

AMD

A8-6410

The A8-6410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,772 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Celeron G1840

The Celeron G1840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,784 points. Launch price was $53.

Processing Power

The A8-6410 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G1840 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-6410 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A8-6410 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1840 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G1840 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A8-6410 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G1840 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6410 scores 1,772 against the Celeron G1840's 1,784 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron G1840.

FeatureA8-6410Celeron G1840
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.8 GHz+40%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Beema (2014)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,772
1,784
Geekbench 6 Single
488
Geekbench 6 Multi
832
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6410 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1840 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6410 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1840 — the A8-6410 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1840 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A8-6410) vs 2 (Celeron G1840). PCIe lanes: 4 (A8-6410) vs 16 (Celeron G1840) — the Celeron G1840 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT3b (A8-6410) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1840).

FeatureA8-6410Celeron G1840
Socket
FT3
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1866+62100%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
32 GB+209715100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
16+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-6410) vs VT-x (Celeron G1840). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R5 Graphics (A8-6410) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1840) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-6410 rivals Pentium N3530; Celeron G1840 rivals Pentium G3240.

FeatureA8-6410Celeron G1840
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 Graphics
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The A8-6410 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Celeron G1840 debuted at $35. At current prices ($40 vs $30), the Celeron G1840 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-6410 delivers 44.3 pts/$ vs 59.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G1840 — making the Celeron G1840 the 29.2% better value option.

FeatureA8-6410Celeron G1840
MSRP
$100
$35-65%
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$30-25%
Performance per Dollar
44.3
59.5+34%
Release Date
2014
2014