Radeon R5 A6-7480 vs RADEON HD6410D

AMD

Radeon R5 A6-7480

2016Core: 1120 MHzBoost: 1266 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON HD6410D

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R5 A6-7480 vs RADEON HD6410D Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 A6-7480 vs RADEON HD6410D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 A6-7480 vs RADEON HD6410D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 A6-7480

2016

Why buy it

  • 96.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 64.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

RADEON HD6410D

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 A6-7480 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 19.9 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 96.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 64.8% in PassMark G3D (697 vs 423), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON HD6410D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 14nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 A6-7480 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $35 vs $35, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 64.8% (19.9 vs 12.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON HD6410D has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R5 A6-7480 vs RADEON HD6410D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R5 A6-7480

The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points. Launch price was $229.

AMD

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R5 A6-7480 scores 697 versus the RADEON HD6410D's 423 — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 leads by 64.8%. The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is built on GCN 4.0 while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon R5 A6-7480) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D). Raw compute: 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A6-7480) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D). Boost clocks: 1266 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R5 A6-7480RADEON HD6410D
G3D Mark Score
697+65%
423
Architecture
GCN 4.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2304+1700%
128
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.834 TFLOPS+936%
0.5632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
2200 MHz+74%
ROPs
32+700%
4
TMUs
144+1700%
8
L1 Cache
576 KB+1700%
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 A6-7480RADEON HD6410D
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A6-7480 and 128-bit on the RADEON HD6410D.

FeatureRadeon R5 A6-7480RADEON HD6410D
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 A6-7480 draws 150W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 A6-7480) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon R5 A6-7480RADEON HD6410D
TDP
150W
15W-90%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
Legacy
Perf/Watt
4.6
28.2+513%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 A6-7480 came in at $35, while the RADEON HD6410D launched at $35. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.9 (Radeon R5 A6-7480) vs 12.1 (RADEON HD6410D) — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 offers 64.5% better value. The newer card here is RADEON HD6410D (2023 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon R5 A6-7480RADEON HD6410D
MSRP
$35
$35
Performance per Dollar
19.9+64%
12.1
Codename
Ellesmere
Dragon Range
Release
June 29 2016
January 3 2023
Ranking
#305
#843

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.