
RADEON HD6410D

RADEON 9000
RADEON HD6410D vs RADEON 9000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RADEON HD6410D vs RADEON 9000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RADEON HD6410D vs RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RADEON HD6410D
2023Why buy it
- ✅716.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11744% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
RADEON 9000
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RADEON HD6410D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌40% HIGHER MSRP$49 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON HD6410D vs RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON HD6410D
The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

RADEON 9000
The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON HD6410D scores 423 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the RADEON HD6410D leads by 8360%. The RADEON HD6410D is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 128 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 2 RT cores (RADEON HD6410D) vs 16 (RADEON 9000).
| Feature | RADEON HD6410D | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 423+8360% | 5 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 128 | 1024+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5632 TFLOPS | 5.939 TFLOPS+955% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz | 2900 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 4 | 32+700% |
| TMUs | 8 | 64+700% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 256 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 2 | 16+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON HD6410D | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON HD6410D has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 carries 128 MB. RADEON HD6410D gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RADEON HD6410D and 64-bit on the RADEON 9000.
| Feature | RADEON HD6410D | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON HD6410D draws 15W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 0% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON HD6410D) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON HD6410D | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 28.2+9300% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RADEON HD6410D came in at $35, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49. On MSRP, RADEON HD6410D was 28.6% cheaper ($14 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.1 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 12000% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | RADEON HD6410D | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35-29% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.1+12000% | 0.1 |
| Codename | Dragon Range | Strix Point |
| Release | January 3 2023 | July 15 2024 |
| Ranking | #843 | #312 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














