RADEON HD6410D vs RADEON 9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON HD6410D is positioned at rank 340 and the RADEON 9000 is on rank 742, so the RADEON HD6410D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6410D

#330

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

898%

#332

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

814%

#333

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

812%

#337

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

738%

#338

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

733%

#340

RADEON HD6410D

MSRP: $35|Avg: $5

100%

#341

GeForce 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

100%

#342

Radeon R7 M465X

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

99%

#344

GeForce 830A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

97%

#348

GeForce MX350

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

94%

#349

GeForce 840A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

92%

#350

HD Graphics 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

92%

#351

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

92%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9000

#731

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

108570%

#733

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

98420%

#734

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

98160%

#738

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

89260%

#739

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

88650%

#741

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

100%

#742

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

100%

#743

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

80%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

60%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

60%

#746

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

50%

#747

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

40%

#748

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

40%

#749

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

30%

#750

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

30%

#751

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

30%

#752

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

30%

#753

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

20%

#754

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

10%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

10%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON HD6410D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8360% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9000.

Insight	RADEON HD6410D	RADEON 9000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+8360%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-8360%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)	RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON HD6410D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $20 for the RADEON 9000, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 33740% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON HD6410D	RADEON 9000
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+33740%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($5)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON HD6410D Benchmark Check

RADEON 9000 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON HD6410D and RADEON 9000

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON HD6410D scores 423 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the RADEON HD6410D leads by 8360%. The RADEON HD6410D is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 128 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 2 RT cores (RADEON HD6410D) vs 16 (RADEON 9000).

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score	423+8360%	5
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	5 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	128	1024+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5632 TFLOPS	5.939 TFLOPS+955%
Boost Clock	2200 MHz	2900 MHz+32%
ROPs	4	32+700%
TMUs	8	64+700%
L1 Cache	32 KB	256 KB+700%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	2	16+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON HD6410D comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 has 128 MB. The RADEON HD6410D offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON HD6410D draws 15W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 0% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON HD6410D) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	RADEON 9000
TDP	15W	15W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Perf/Watt	28.2+9300%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON HD6410D launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49 and now averages $20. The RADEON HD6410D costs 75% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 84.6 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 0.3 (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 28100% better value. The RADEON 9000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	RADEON 9000
MSRP	$35-29%	$49
Avg Price (30d)	$5-75%	$20
Performance per Dollar	84.6+28100%	0.3
Codename	Dragon Range	Strix Point
Release	January 3 2023	July 15 2024
Ranking	#843	#312