A8-6410 vs Core i5-13400F
A8-6410
Core i5-13400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The A8-6410 is positioned at rank #928 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A8-6410
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A8-6410 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A8-6410 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+214%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-6410 and Core i5-13400F
A8-6410
The A8-6410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,772 points. Launch price was $90.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The A8-6410 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A8-6410 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 62.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A8-6410 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6410 scores 1,772 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 173.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | A8-6410 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 10 / 16+150% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+92% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | — | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | Intel 7 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Beema (2014) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 1,772 | 25,029+1312% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-6410 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6410 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the A8-6410 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A8-6410) vs 2 (Core i5-13400F). PCIe lanes: 4 (A8-6410) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT3b (A8-6410) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | A8-6410 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1866+37220% | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 192 GB+1258291100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 20+400% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-6410) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The A8-6410 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: A8-6410 rivals Pentium N3530; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | A8-6410 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The A8-6410 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. At current prices ($40 vs $180), the A8-6410 is $140 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-6410 delivers 44.3 pts/$ vs 139.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 103.4% better value option.
| Feature | A8-6410 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-49% | $196 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-78% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.3 | 139.1+214% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A8-6410 and Core i5-13400F
