A8-6500 vs Xeon X3380

A8-6500 vs Xeon X3380 Performance Spectrum

A8-6500

4 / 4

2,598

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X3380

2,568

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-6500 vs Xeon X3380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-6500 vs Xeon X3380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-6500

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8570D, while Xeon X3380 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Xeon X3380.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon X3380

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,568 vs 2,598).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-6500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-6500.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-6500 better than Xeon X3380?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3380 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A8-6500 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-6500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-6500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-6500 still makes the most sense overall. A8-6500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-6500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-6500 vs Xeon X3380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-6500

The A8-6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,598 points. Launch price was $90.

Xeon X3380

The Xeon X3380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.16 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,568 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-6500 is built on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the A8-6500 scores 2,598 against the Xeon X3380's 2,568 — a 1.2% lead for the A8-6500. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-6500 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3380.

Feature	A8-6500	Xeon X3380
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+11%	3.16 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	12 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	4096 kB	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	2,598+1%	2,568

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3380 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-6500	Xeon X3380
Socket	FM2	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	64	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-6500) / not specified (Xeon X3380). The A8-6500 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8570D), while the Xeon X3380 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-6500 rivals Core i3-4130.