A8-7600 vs Core i5-2400S

A8-7600 vs Core i5-2400S Performance Spectrum

A8-7600

4 / 4

3,214

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-2400S

4 / 4

3,187

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7600 vs Core i5-2400S FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7600 vs Core i5-2400S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7600

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-2400S

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,187 vs 3,214).
❌Launch MSRP is still $135 MSRP, while A8-7600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7600 better than Core i5-2400S?

Yes. A8-7600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-7600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-7600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-7600 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A8-7600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $135 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-2400S only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-7600 vs Core i5-2400S Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7600

The A8-7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,214 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i5-2400S

The Core i5-2400S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,187 points. Launch price was $141.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A8-7600 and Core i5-2400S share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A8-7600 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2400S — a 14.1% clock advantage for the A8-7600 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A8-7600 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-2400S uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7600 scores 3,214 against the Core i5-2400S's 3,187 — a 0.8% lead for the A8-7600.

Feature	A8-7600	Core i5-2400S
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+15%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+24%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	3,214	3,187
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	1,965
Geekbench 6 Single	—	578
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,966

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7600 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-2400S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A8-7600 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2400S — the A8-7600 supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-7600 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A8-7600) and H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Core i5-2400S).

Feature	A8-7600	Core i5-2400S
Socket	FM2+	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2133+60%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (A8-7600) vs Yes (Core i5-2400S). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 Graphics (A8-7600) and Intel HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2400S) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7600 rivals Core i3-4150.