A9-9425 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPU

GPU

A9-9425

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2016

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Buy on Amazon

A9-9425 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

A9-9425

2 / 2

1,518

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 / 16

22,430

+1377.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A9-9425 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A9-9425 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A9-9425

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,518 vs 22,430).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +565.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 573.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
119.3% HIGHER MSRP
$329 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A9-9425 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than A9-9425?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 565.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1377.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 565.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1377.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in 119.3% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 565.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 573.7% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 10.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A9-9425 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A9-9425

The A9-9425 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,518 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The A9-9425 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the A9-9425 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A9-9425 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the A9-9425 scores 1,518 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 174.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A9-9425 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	A9-9425	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	8 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.4 GHz+19%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	0 kB	32 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	28 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-75%
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	1,518	22,430+1378%
Geekbench 6 Single	422	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	724	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A9-9425 uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A9-9425 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A9-9425) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 8 (A9-9425) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A9-9425) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	A9-9425	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	FT4	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR4-3200+50%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	128 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	24+200%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A9-9425) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The A9-9425 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A9-9425 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A9-9425 rivals Pentium N4200.

Feature	A9-9425	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Budget Laptop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A9-9425 was priced at $150, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($150 vs $329), A9-9425 was $179 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A9-9425 delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 148.3% better value option.

Feature	A9-9425	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$150-54%	$329
Performance per Dollar	10.1	68.2+575%
Release Date	2016	2019

Search A9-9425 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.