
A9-9425

Ryzen 9 5900X
A9-9425 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A9-9425 vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A9-9425 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A9-9425
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $399 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (724 vs 11,888).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +642.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 601.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌266% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A9-9425 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than A9-9425?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A9-9425 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A9-9425
The A9-9425 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,518 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The A9-9425 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the A9-9425 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 25.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The A9-9425 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the A9-9425 scores 1,518 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 185% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 422 vs 2,174, a 135% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 724 vs 11,888 (177% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 0 kB on the A9-9425 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | A9-9425 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 12 / 24+500% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 28 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 1,518 | 38,955+2466% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 422 | 2,174+415% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 724 | 11,888+1542% |
Memory & Platform
The A9-9425 uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A9-9425 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A9-9425) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X). PCIe lanes: 8 (A9-9425) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A9-9425) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | A9-9425 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR4-3200+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 24+200% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A9-9425 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A9-9425 targets Budget Laptop, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: A9-9425 rivals Pentium N4200; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | A9-9425 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A9-9425 was priced at $150, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($150 vs $549), A9-9425 was $399 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A9-9425 delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 150.1% better value option.
| Feature | A9-9425 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-73% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.1 | 71.0+603% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














