
Arc A530M vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT

Arc A530M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc A530M is positioned at rank 243 and the Radeon Pro 5500 XT is on rank 29, so the Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A530M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A530M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 5500 XT.
| Insight | Arc A530M | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A530M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A530M and Radeon Pro 5500 XT

Arc A530M
The Arc A530M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 1 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,013 points.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A530M scores 8,013 and the Radeon Pro 5500 XT reaches 7,910 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A530M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Arc A530M) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (Arc A530M) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A530M | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,013+1% | 7,910 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.994 TFLOPS | 5.398 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1757 MHz+35% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A530M | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A530M) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the Arc A530M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A530M | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A530M) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Arc A530M | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A530M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A530M) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT).
| Feature | Arc A530M | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A530M draws 65W versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT's 125W — a 63.2% difference. The Arc A530M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A530M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc A530M | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-48% | 125W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 123.3+95% | 63.3 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A530M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Arc A530M | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | DG2-256 | Navi 14 |
| Release | August 1 2023 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #317 | #322 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















