Athlon 3000G vs Core i3-7101E

CPU

GPU

Athlon 3000G

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2019

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-7101E

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2017

Buy on Amazon

Athlon 3000G vs Core i3-7101E Performance Spectrum

Athlon 3000G

2 / 4

4,446

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Core i3-7101E

2 / 4

4,430

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 3000G vs Core i3-7101E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 3000G vs Core i3-7101E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 3000G

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $68 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
✅Delivers 139.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 90.7 vs 37.9 PassMark/$ ($49 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (956 vs 1,250).

Core i3-7101E

2017

Why buy it

✅+30.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,430 vs 4,446).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.9 vs 90.7 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 3000G.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 3000G better than Core i3-7101E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-7101E is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 3000G pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Athlon 3000G also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 3000G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 3000G is the better buy right now. Athlon 3000G comes in $68 cheaper on MSRP at $49 MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i3-7101E is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 139.6% better value on MSRP (90.7 vs 37.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 3000G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 3000G vs Core i3-7101E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 3000G

The Athlon 3000G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,446 points. Launch price was $49.

Core i3-7101E

The Core i3-7101E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,430 points. Launch price was $117.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 3000G and Core i3-7101E share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 3000G versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-7101E — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-7101E (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Athlon 3000G uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-7101E uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 3000G scores 4,446 against the Core i3-7101E's 4,430 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 3000G. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 956 vs 1,250, a 26.7% lead for the Core i3-7101E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 3000G vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7101E.

Feature	Athlon 3000G	Core i3-7101E
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.9 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%	3 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	4,446	4,430
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,800	—
Geekbench 6 Single	956	1,250+31%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,970	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 3000G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7101E uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Athlon 3000G versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7101E — the Athlon 3000G supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM4 (Athlon 3000G) and C236,C232,Q170,Q270 (Core i3-7101E).

Feature	Athlon 3000G	Core i3-7101E
Socket	AM4	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2666+11%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon 3000G has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Athlon 3000G) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7101E). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Vega 3 Graphics (Athlon 3000G) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7101E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7101E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Athlon 3000G rivals Pentium Gold G6400; Core i3-7101E rivals Embedded Ryzen V1000.

Feature	Athlon 3000G	Core i3-7101E
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 3 Graphics	HD Graphics 630
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 3000G was priced at $49, while the Core i3-7101E came in at $117. On launch pricing ($49 vs $117), Athlon 3000G was $68 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 3000G delivers 90.7 pts/$ vs 37.9 pts/$ for the Core i3-7101E — making the Athlon 3000G the 82.2% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 3000G	Core i3-7101E
MSRP	$49-58%	$117
Performance per Dollar	90.7+139%	37.9
Release Date	2019	2017

Search Athlon 3000G on Amazon

Search Core i3-7101E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.