
Athlon 3000G vs Core i3-7101E

Athlon 3000G

Core i3-7101E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 3000G
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7101E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($60) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+20%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($60) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 3000G and Core i3-7101E

Athlon 3000G
The Athlon 3000G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,446 points. Launch price was $49.

Core i3-7101E
The Core i3-7101E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,430 points. Launch price was $117.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 3000G and Core i3-7101E share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 3000G versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-7101E — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-7101E (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Athlon 3000G uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-7101E uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 3000G scores 4,446 against the Core i3-7101E's 4,430 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 3000G. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 956 vs 1,250, a 26.7% lead for the Core i3-7101E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 3000G vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7101E.
| Feature | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 4,446 | 4,430 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,800 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 956 | 1,250+31% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,970 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 3000G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7101E uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Athlon 3000G versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7101E — the Athlon 3000G supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM4 (Athlon 3000G) and C236,C232,Q170,Q270 (Core i3-7101E).
| Feature | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666+66550% | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | 64 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon 3000G has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Athlon 3000G) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7101E). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Vega 3 Graphics (Athlon 3000G) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7101E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7101E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Athlon 3000G rivals Pentium Gold G6400; Core i3-7101E rivals Embedded Ryzen V1000.
| Feature | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 Graphics | HD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Embedded |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 3000G launched at $49 MSRP, while the Core i3-7101E debuted at $117. At current prices ($60 vs $50), the Core i3-7101E is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 3000G delivers 74.1 pts/$ vs 88.6 pts/$ for the Core i3-7101E — making the Core i3-7101E the 17.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-58% | $117 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $50-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.1 | 88.6+20% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















