CPU
GPU
Athlon 5150
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 5150 is positioned at rank 314 and the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is on rank 988, so the Athlon 5150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 5150
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 5150 | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($21) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 5150 | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+99%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($21) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 5150 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Athlon 5150
The Athlon 5150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,415 points. Launch price was $149.
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,425 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Athlon 5150 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon 5150 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 5150 versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5000+. The Athlon 5150 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5150 scores 1,415 against the Athlon 64 X2 5000+'s 1,425 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5000+.
| Feature | Athlon 5150 | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz+63% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+300% | 512 kB |
| Process | 28 nm-69% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,415 | 1,425 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 5150 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Athlon 5150 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ — the Athlon 5150 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 5150) vs 2 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+). PCIe lanes: 4 (Athlon 5150) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+) — the Athlon 5150 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM1 (Athlon 5150) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+).
| Feature | Athlon 5150 | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM1 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+79900% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 16 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Athlon 5150) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5000+). The Athlon 5150 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3 Graphics), while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon 5150 rivals Pentium J2900.
| Feature | Athlon 5150 | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R3 Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 5150 launched at $21 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ debuted at $136. At current prices ($21 vs $42), the Athlon 5150 is $21 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 5150 delivers 67.4 pts/$ vs 33.9 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ — making the Athlon 5150 the 66% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 5150 | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $21-85% | $136 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $21-50% | $42 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.4+99% | 33.9 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 5150 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+
