Athlon 64 3100+
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Athlon 64 3100+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 3100+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 3100+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 3100+
2008Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 512W, a 487W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
2003Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 64 3100+ across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (450 vs 475).
- ❌1948% higher power demand at 512W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 64 3100+ better than Mobile Athlon 64 3000+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 3100+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon 64 3100+
The Athlon 64 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $149.
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 3100+ and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3100+ versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 3100+ uses the Lima (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses Oakville (2003−2004). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3100+ scores 475 against the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+'s 450 — a 5.4% lead for the Athlon 64 3100+.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3100+ | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 512K |
| Process | 65 nm | — |
| Architecture | Lima (2008−2009) | Oakville (2003−2004) |
| PassMark | 475+6% | 450 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 280 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 280 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 3100+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 3100+ versus 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ — the Athlon 64 3100+ supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 3100+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 3100+) vs 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon 64 3100+) vs 0 (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+) — the Athlon 64 3100+ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: nForce 500,AMD 690G (Athlon 64 3100+) and 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+).
| Feature | Athlon 64 3100+ | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800+100% | 400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 64 3100+) vs false (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+). Primary use case: Athlon 64 3100+ targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 3100+ rivals Celeron D 352; Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3100+ | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | false |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 3100+ and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
