Athlon 64 3100+ vs Celeron 570

AMD

Athlon 64 3100+

1 Cores1 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Celeron 570

31 WW2008
Similar parts
·······

Athlon 64 3100+ vs Celeron 570 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3100+ vs Celeron 570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3100+ vs Celeron 570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3100+

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $34 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
  • Delivers 26.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 3.8 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
  • Draws 25W instead of 31W, a 6W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 570 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (475 vs 505).

Celeron 570

2008

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 4.8 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 24% higher power demand at 31W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 570 better than Athlon 64 3100+?
Yes. Celeron 570 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 6.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron 570 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 570 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.3% better PassMark.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron 570 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron 570 comes in 34.0% more expensive on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 64 3100+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 26.0% better value on paper (4.8 vs 3.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 570 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Athlon 64 3100+ vs Celeron 570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon 64 3100+

The Athlon 64 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 3100+ is built on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3100+ scores 475 against the Celeron 570's 505 — a 6.1% lead for the Celeron 570.

FeatureAthlon 64 3100+Celeron 570
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512K
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Lima (2008−2009)
PassMark
475
505+6%
Geekbench 6 Single
280
Geekbench 6 Multi
280
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3100+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 570 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 3100+ versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron 570 — the Athlon 64 3100+ supports 19.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon 64 3100+) vs 0 (Celeron 570) — the Athlon 64 3100+ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: nForce 500,AMD 690G (Athlon 64 3100+) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron 570).

FeatureAthlon 64 3100+Celeron 570
Socket
AM2
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800+20%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 64 3100+) vs No (Celeron 570). Primary use case: Athlon 64 3100+ targets Legacy Desktop, Celeron 570 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 3100+ rivals Celeron D 352; Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310.

FeatureAthlon 64 3100+Celeron 570
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
No
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 3100+ was priced at $100, while the Celeron 570 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($100 vs $134), Athlon 64 3100+ was $34 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 3100+ delivers 4.8 pts/$ vs 3.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 570 — making the Athlon 64 3100+ the 23% better value option.

FeatureAthlon 64 3100+Celeron 570
MSRP
$100-25%
$134
Performance per Dollar
4.8+26%
3.8
Release Date
2008
2008

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.