Athlon 64 3100+ vs Sempron 3600+
Athlon 64 3100+
Sempron 3600+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3100+ is positioned at rank 1074 and the Sempron 3600+ is on rank 1075, so the Athlon 64 3100+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3100+
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3600+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 3100+ | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Manila (2001−2006) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 3100+ | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+31%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3100+ and Sempron 3600+
Athlon 64 3100+
The Athlon 64 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $149.
Sempron 3600+
The Sempron 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $12.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 3100+ and Sempron 3600+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3100+ versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3600+ — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 3100+ uses the Lima (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 3600+ uses Manila (2001−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3100+ scores 475 against the Sempron 3600+'s 485 — a 2.1% lead for the Sempron 3600+.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3100+ | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K+100% | 256K |
| Process | 65 nm-28% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Lima (2008−2009) | Manila (2001−2006) |
| PassMark | 475 | 485+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 280 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 280 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM2 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 3100+) vs 1 (Sempron 3600+). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon 64 3100+) vs 0 (Sempron 3600+) — the Athlon 64 3100+ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3100+ | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 64 3100+) vs None (Sempron 3600+). Primary use case: Athlon 64 3100+ targets Legacy Desktop, Sempron 3600+ targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 3100+ rivals Celeron D 352.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3100+ | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | None |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 3100+ launched at $100 MSRP, while the Sempron 3600+ debuted at $105. At current prices ($15 vs $20), the Athlon 64 3100+ is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 3100+ delivers 31.7 pts/$ vs 24.3 pts/$ for the Sempron 3600+ — making the Athlon 64 3100+ the 26.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3100+ | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-5% | $105 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.7+30% | 24.3 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 3100+ and Sempron 3600+
