Athlon 64 3100+
VS
Turion 64 MT-32

Athlon 64 3100+ vs Turion 64 MT-32

AMD

Athlon 64 3100+

1 Cores1 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
VS
AMD

Turion 64 MT-32

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.79 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3100+ is positioned at rank 1074 and the Turion 64 MT-32 is on rank 942, so the Turion 64 MT-32 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3100+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
65624%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
62008%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
45023%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
13564%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
10744%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
9399%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
5383%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
5313%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
4837%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
4837%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
4783%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
4654%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
4589%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
4570%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
4529%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
97%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
90%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
85%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
84%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
83%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
83%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
81%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
75%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
75%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
74%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
73%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
72%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
70%
#1088
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
69%
#1089
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 MT-32

#930
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1743%
#931
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1718%
#932
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1577%
#933
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1570%
#934
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1555%
#936
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1502%
#937
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1440%
#938
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1438%
#939
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1399%
#942
Turion 64 MT-32
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
99%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
99%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#949
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
97%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
97%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
96%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon 64 3100+ leads in gaming performance. However, the Turion 64 MT-32 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 6.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon 64 3100+Turion 64 MT-32
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon 64 3100+Turion 64 MT-32
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3100+ and Turion 64 MT-32

AMD

Athlon 64 3100+

The Athlon 64 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Turion 64 MT-32

The Turion 64 MT-32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3100+ and Turion 64 MT-32 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3100+ versus 1.79 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-32 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3100+. The Athlon 64 3100+ uses the Lima (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-32 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3100+ scores 475 against the Turion 64 MT-32's 505 — a 6.1% lead for the Turion 64 MT-32.

FeatureAthlon 64 3100+Turion 64 MT-32
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2 GHz+12%
1.79 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K
512 kB
Process
65 nm-28%
90 nm
Architecture
Lima (2008−2009)
Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark
475
505+6%
Geekbench 6 Single
280
Geekbench 6 Multi
280
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3100+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 MT-32 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 3100+Turion 64 MT-32
Socket
AM2
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 64 3100+) / not specified (Turion 64 MT-32). Primary use case: Athlon 64 3100+ targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 3100+ rivals Celeron D 352.

FeatureAthlon 64 3100+Turion 64 MT-32
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Desktop