Athlon 64 3100+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Athlon 64 3100+
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3100+ is positioned at rank 1074 and the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is on rank 1079, so the Athlon 64 3100+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3100+
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 3100+ | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Newark (2003) / Standard Node) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 3100+ | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3100+ and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Athlon 64 3100+
The Athlon 64 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $149.
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Newark (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 3100+ and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3100+ versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 3100+ uses the Lima (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses Newark (2003). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3100+ scores 475 against the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+'s 505 — a 6.1% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3100+ | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 65 nm | — |
| Architecture | Lima (2008−2009) | Newark (2003) |
| PassMark | 475 | 505+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 280 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 280 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 3100+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 3100+ versus 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ — the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 3100+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 3100+) vs 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon 64 3100+) vs 0 (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) — the Athlon 64 3100+ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: nForce 500,AMD 690G (Athlon 64 3100+) and 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+).
| Feature | Athlon 64 3100+ | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | 400+19900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+209715100% | 2 |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 64 3100+) vs false (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+). Primary use case: Athlon 64 3100+ targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 3100+ rivals Celeron D 352; Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3100+ | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | false |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 3100+ and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
