Athlon 64 3500+ vs Pentium M 770

AMD

Athlon 64 3500+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium M 770

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 0.01 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······

Athlon 64 3500+ vs Pentium M 770 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3500+ vs Pentium M 770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3500+ vs Pentium M 770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3500+

2001

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $272 MSRP, while Pentium M 770 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 229.6% higher power demand at 89W vs 27W.

    Pentium M 770

    2005

    Why buy it

    • Draws 27W instead of 89W, a 62W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (545 vs 570).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon 64 3500+ better than Pentium M 770?
    Yes. Athlon 64 3500+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 4.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 3500+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 3500+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon 64 3500+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 3500+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $272 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium M 770 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Athlon 64 3500+ vs Pentium M 770 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon 64 3500+

    The Athlon 64 3500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 570 points. Launch price was $59.

    Intel

    Pentium M 770

    The Pentium M 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.01 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon 64 3500+ and Pentium M 770 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3500+ versus 0.01 GHz on the Pentium M 770 — a 198.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3500+. The Athlon 64 3500+ uses the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 770 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3500+ scores 570 against the Pentium M 770's 545 — a 4.5% lead for the Athlon 64 3500+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAthlon 64 3500+Pentium M 770
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2.2 GHz+21900%
    0.01 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.13 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    2 MB+300%
    Process
    130 nm
    90 nm-31%
    Architecture
    San Diego (2001−2005)
    Dothan (2004−2005)
    PassMark
    570+5%
    545
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon 64 3500+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 770 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon 64 3500+Pentium M 770
    Socket
    939
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR-400
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0