Athlon 64 3600+
VS
Opteron 152

Athlon 64 3600+ vs Opteron 152

AMD

Athlon 64 3600+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2004
VS
AMD

Opteron 152

1 Cores1 Thrd104 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3600+ is positioned at rank 1078 and the Opteron 152 is on rank 700, so the Opteron 152 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3600+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
78124%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
73820%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
53599%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
16147%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
12790%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
11189%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
6409%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
6325%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
5759%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
5758%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
5694%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
5540%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
5463%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
5441%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
5391%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
100%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
99%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
98%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
97%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
90%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
90%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
88%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
87%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
86%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
83%
#1088
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
83%
#1089
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
83%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
83%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
82%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
81%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 152

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
13408%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
97%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2532%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2249%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1738%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
99%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
99%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
99%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
98%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
98%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
98%
#416
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $3486
98%
#417
EPYC 9474F
MSRP: $6780|Avg: $3723
97%
#700
Opteron 152
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#703
Xeon E5-2630
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
99%
#705
Xeon X5680
MSRP: $450|Avg: $13
99%
#708
Pentium 1403 v2
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Opteron 152 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon 64 3600+ in both compute-intensive tasks (4.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon 64 3600+Opteron 152
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Venus (2004−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon 64 3600+Opteron 152
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3600+ and Opteron 152

AMD

Athlon 64 3600+

The Athlon 64 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 595 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Opteron 152

The Opteron 152 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Venus (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 620 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3600+ and Opteron 152 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3600+ versus 2.6 GHz on the Opteron 152 — a 8% clock advantage for the Opteron 152. The Athlon 64 3600+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Opteron 152 uses Venus (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3600+ scores 595 against the Opteron 152's 620 — a 4.1% lead for the Opteron 152.

FeatureAthlon 64 3600+Opteron 152
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz+8%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Process
130 nm
90 nm-31%
Architecture
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Venus (2004−2005)
PassMark
595
620+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3600+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Opteron 152 uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 3600+Opteron 152
Socket
754
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0