Athlon 64 3600+ vs Xeon 3.20
Athlon 64 3600+
Xeon 3.20
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3600+ is positioned at rank 1078 and the Xeon 3.20 is on rank 1030, so the Xeon 3.20 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3600+
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 3.20
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 3600+ | Xeon 3.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Gallatin (2003−2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 3600+ | Xeon 3.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+45%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3600+ and Xeon 3.20
Athlon 64 3600+
The Athlon 64 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 595 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon 3.20
The Xeon 3.20 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Gallatin (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 3600+ and Xeon 3.20 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3600+ versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 3.20 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon 3.20. The Athlon 64 3600+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Xeon 3.20 uses Gallatin (2003−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3600+ scores 595 against the Xeon 3.20's 575 — a 3.4% lead for the Athlon 64 3600+.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3600+ | Xeon 3.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | Gallatin (2003−2004) |
| PassMark | 595+3% | 575 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 3600+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon 3.20 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3600+ | Xeon 3.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 3600+ launched at $149 MSRP, while the Xeon 3.20 debuted at $851. At current prices ($15 vs $10), the Xeon 3.20 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 3600+ delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 57.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 3.20 — making the Xeon 3.20 the 36.7% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3600+ | Xeon 3.20 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-82% | $851 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7 | 57.5+45% |
| Release Date | 2004 | 2003 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 3600+ and Xeon 3.20
