Athlon 64 3600+
VS
Pentium M 780

Athlon 64 3600+ vs Pentium M 780

AMD

Athlon 64 3600+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2004
VS
Intel

Pentium M 780

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 0.03 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3600+ is positioned at rank 1078 and the Pentium M 780 is on rank 807, so the Pentium M 780 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3600+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
78124%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
73820%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
53599%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
16147%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
12790%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
11189%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
6409%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
6325%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
5759%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
5758%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
5694%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
5540%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
5463%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
5441%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
5391%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
100%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
99%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
98%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
97%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
90%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
90%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
88%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
87%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
86%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
83%
#1088
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
83%
#1089
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
83%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
83%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
82%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
81%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 780

#795
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1225%
#796
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1207%
#797
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1108%
#798
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1103%
#799
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1093%
#801
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1055%
#802
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1012%
#803
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1010%
#804
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
983%
#807
Pentium M 780
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
100%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
100%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#812
Athlon II Neo K345
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#818
Core i7-8709G
MSRP: $338|Avg: $150
98%
#819
Celeron M 560
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon 64 3600+ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium M 780 in both compute-intensive tasks (3.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon 64 3600+Pentium M 780
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon 64 3600+Pentium M 780
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3600+ and Pentium M 780

AMD

Athlon 64 3600+

The Athlon 64 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 595 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Pentium M 780

The Pentium M 780 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3600+ and Pentium M 780 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3600+ versus 0.03 GHz on the Pentium M 780 — a 195.1% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3600+. The Athlon 64 3600+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 780 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3600+ scores 595 against the Pentium M 780's 575 — a 3.4% lead for the Athlon 64 3600+.

FeatureAthlon 64 3600+Pentium M 780
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+7900%
0.03 GHz
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
130 nm
90 nm-31%
Architecture
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark
595+3%
575
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3600+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 780 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. The Athlon 64 3600+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 3600+) vs 16 (Pentium M 780) — the Pentium M 780 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 3600+) and 915GM,945GT (Pentium M 780).

FeatureAthlon 64 3600+Pentium M 780
Socket
754
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 3600+) / false (Pentium M 780).

FeatureAthlon 64 3600+Pentium M 780
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false