Athlon 64 3600+ vs Turion 64 MT-37

AMD

Athlon 64 3600+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2004
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Turion 64 MT-37

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······

Athlon 64 3600+ vs Turion 64 MT-37 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3600+ vs Turion 64 MT-37 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3600+ vs Turion 64 MT-37: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3600+

2004

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Turion 64 MT-37 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 8800% higher power demand at 89W vs 1W.

Turion 64 MT-37

2005

Why buy it

  • Draws 1W instead of 89W, a 88W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 64 3600+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (555 vs 595).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 3600+ better than Turion 64 MT-37?
Yes. Athlon 64 3600+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 7.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 3600+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 3600+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon 64 3600+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 3600+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $149 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Turion 64 MT-37 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 3600+ vs Turion 64 MT-37 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon 64 3600+

The Athlon 64 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 595 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Turion 64 MT-37

The Turion 64 MT-37 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3600+ and Turion 64 MT-37 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3600+ versus 2 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-37 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3600+. The Athlon 64 3600+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-37 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3600+ scores 595 against the Turion 64 MT-37's 555 — a 7% lead for the Athlon 64 3600+.

FeatureAthlon 64 3600+Turion 64 MT-37
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+20%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Process
130 nm
90 nm-31%
Architecture
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark
595+7%
555
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 1.1.

FeatureAthlon 64 3600+Turion 64 MT-37
Socket
754
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0