Athlon 64 4000+ vs Core 2 Duo L7200
Athlon 64 4000+
Core 2 Duo L7200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 4000+ is positioned at rank 1112 and the Core 2 Duo L7200 is on rank 56, so the Core 2 Duo L7200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 4000+
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo L7200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 4000+ | Core 2 Duo L7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (San Diego (2001−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 4000+ | Core 2 Duo L7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 4000+ and Core 2 Duo L7200
Athlon 64 4000+
The Athlon 64 4000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $160.
Core 2 Duo L7200
The Core 2 Duo L7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It has 2 cores. Base frequency: 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 4000+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core 2 Duo L7200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Duo L7200 has 1 more core. The Athlon 64 4000+ is built on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 4000+ scores 675 against the Core 2 Duo L7200's 685 — a 1.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo L7200. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 4000+ vs 4 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo L7200.
| Feature | Athlon 64 4000+ | Core 2 Duo L7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 1.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512K | — |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | San Diego (2001−2005) | — |
| PassMark | 675 | 685+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 4000+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo L7200 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 4000+ | Core 2 Duo L7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | BGA479 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 4000+ and Core 2 Duo L7200
