Athlon 64 4000+ vs Pentium T2330

Athlon 64 4000+ vs Pentium T2330 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 4000+

1 / 1

675

+1.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium T2330

665

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 4000+ vs Pentium T2330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 4000+ vs Pentium T2330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 4000+

2001

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 4.4 PassMark/$ ($482 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌154.3% higher power demand at 89W vs 35W.

Pentium T2330

2007

Why buy it

✅Costs $332 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $482 MSRP).
✅Delivers 216.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.4 vs 1.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $482 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 89W, a 54W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (665 vs 675).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 4000+ better than Pentium T2330?

Yes. Athlon 64 4000+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 4000+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 4000+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 4000+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon 64 4000+ comes in 221.3% more expensive on MSRP at $482 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium T2330 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 216.6% better value on paper (4.4 vs 1.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium T2330 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 4000+ vs Pentium T2330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 4000+

The Athlon 64 4000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $160.

Pentium T2330

The Pentium T2330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 4000+ is built on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 4000+ scores 675 against the Pentium T2330's 665 — a 1.5% lead for the Athlon 64 4000+. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 4000+ vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2330.

Feature	Athlon 64 4000+	Pentium T2330
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	—
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512K	—
Process	130 nm	65 nm-50%
Architecture	San Diego (2001−2005)	—
PassMark	675+2%	665
Geekbench 6 Single	—	223
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	402

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 4000+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium T2330 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 4000+ versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium T2330 — the Athlon 64 4000+ supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 4000+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 4000+) vs 4 (Pentium T2330) — the Pentium T2330 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 4000+) and GL960 (Pentium T2330).

Feature	Athlon 64 4000+	Pentium T2330
Socket	939	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800+50%	DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 4000+) / No (Pentium T2330).

Feature	Athlon 64 4000+	Pentium T2330
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	No

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 4000+ was priced at $482, while the Pentium T2330 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($482 vs $150), Pentium T2330 was $332 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 4000+ delivers 1.4 pts/$ vs 4.4 pts/$ for the Pentium T2330 — making the Pentium T2330 the 104% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 4000+	Pentium T2330
MSRP	$482	$150-69%
Performance per Dollar	1.4	4.4+214%
Release Date	2001	2007

Search Athlon 64 4000+ on Amazon

Search Pentium T2330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.