Athlon 64 FX-55 vs Celeron T1600
Athlon 64 FX-55
Celeron T1600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 FX-55 is positioned at rank 1134 and the Celeron T1600 is on rank 1173, so the Athlon 64 FX-55 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-55
Performance Per Dollar Celeron T1600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-55 | Celeron T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-55 | Celeron T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+245%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-55 and Celeron T1600
Athlon 64 FX-55
The Athlon 64 FX-55 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Memory support: DDR1 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 690 points. Launch price was $180.
Celeron T1600
The Celeron T1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 FX-55 is built on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-55 scores 690 against the Celeron T1600's 715 — a 3.6% lead for the Celeron T1600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-55 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1600.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-55 | Celeron T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+57% | 1.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | — |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | — |
| PassMark | 690 | 715+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 FX-55 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron T1600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-55 | Celeron T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1-400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 FX-55 launched at $827 MSRP, while the Celeron T1600 debuted at $107. At current prices ($50 vs $15), the Celeron T1600 is $35 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-55 delivers 13.8 pts/$ vs 47.7 pts/$ for the Celeron T1600 — making the Celeron T1600 the 110.2% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-55 | Celeron T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $827 | $107-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $15-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.8 | 47.7+246% |
| Release Date | 2004 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 FX-55 and Celeron T1600
