Athlon 64 FX-55 vs Pentium T2330

Athlon 64 FX-55 vs Pentium T2330 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 FX-55

1 / 1

690

+3.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium T2330

665

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 FX-55 vs Pentium T2330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 FX-55 vs Pentium T2330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 FX-55

2004

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 4.4 PassMark/$ ($827 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌197.1% higher power demand at 104W vs 35W.

Pentium T2330

2007

Why buy it

✅Costs $677 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $827 MSRP).
✅Delivers 431.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.4 vs 0.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $827 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 104W, a 69W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (665 vs 690).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 FX-55 better than Pentium T2330?

Yes. Athlon 64 FX-55 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 FX-55 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 FX-55 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 FX-55 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon 64 FX-55 comes in 451.3% more expensive on MSRP at $827 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium T2330 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 431.4% better value on paper (4.4 vs 0.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium T2330 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 FX-55 vs Pentium T2330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 FX-55

The Athlon 64 FX-55 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Memory support: DDR1 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 690 points. Launch price was $180.

Pentium T2330

The Pentium T2330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 FX-55 is built on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-55 scores 690 against the Pentium T2330's 665 — a 3.7% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-55. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-55 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2330.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-55	Pentium T2330
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	—
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+63%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	130 nm	65 nm-50%
Architecture	Clawhammer (2001−2005)	—
PassMark	690+4%	665
Geekbench 6 Single	—	223
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	402

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-55 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium T2330 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-400 on the Athlon 64 FX-55 versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium T2330 — the Pentium T2330 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 FX-55) vs 4 (Pentium T2330) — the Pentium T2330 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: nForce3,nForce4,Xpress 200 (Athlon 64 FX-55) and GL960 (Pentium T2330).

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-55	Pentium T2330
Socket	939	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR1-400	DDR2-533+33%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 FX-55) / No (Pentium T2330).

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-55	Pentium T2330
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	No

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 FX-55 was priced at $827, while the Pentium T2330 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($827 vs $150), Pentium T2330 was $677 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-55 delivers 0.8 pts/$ vs 4.4 pts/$ for the Pentium T2330 — making the Pentium T2330 the 136.6% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-55	Pentium T2330
MSRP	$827	$150-82%
Performance per Dollar	0.8	4.4+450%
Release Date	2004	2007

Search Athlon 64 FX-55 on Amazon

Search Pentium T2330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.