Athlon 64 X2 4200+ vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 4200+

2 / 2

1,255

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2 / 2

1,250

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 4200+

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($581 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
❌8800% higher power demand at 89W vs 1W.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $447 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $581 MSRP).
✅Delivers 331.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.3 vs 2.2 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $581 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 89W, a 88W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,250 vs 1,255).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 X2 4200+ better than Celeron Dual-Core SU2300?

Yes. Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Athlon 64 X2 4200+ comes in 333.6% more expensive on MSRP at $581 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 4200+

The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,255 points. Launch price was $309.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 — a 58.8% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 4200+. The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ uses the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ scores 1,255 against the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300's 1,250 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 4200+.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 4200+	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+83%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	90 nm	45 nm-50%
Architecture	Manchester (2005−2006)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,255	1,250
Geekbench 6 Single	—	150
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	280

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 4200+) vs 6 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) — the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 4200+) and GS45 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 4200+	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Socket	939	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 4200+) / VT-x (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 targets Legacy Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 rivals Pentium SU4100.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 4200+	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Legacy Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ was priced at $581, while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($581 vs $134), Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 was $447 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ delivers 2.2 pts/$ vs 9.3 pts/$ for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 — making the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 the 124.8% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 4200+	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP	$581	$134-77%
Performance per Dollar	2.2	9.3+323%
Release Date	2006	2009

Search Athlon 64 X2 4200+ on Amazon

Search Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.