Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

2 Cores2 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual Core SU4100

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

2006

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • 1.5% HIGHER MSRP
      $136 MSRPvs$134 MSRP
    • 4350% higher power demand at 89W vs 2W.

    Pentium Dual Core SU4100

    2009

    Why buy it

    • Costs $2 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $136 MSRP).
    • Draws 2W instead of 89W, a 87W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,409 vs 1,425).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon 64 X2 5000+ better than Pentium Dual Core SU4100?
    Yes. Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 20 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 20 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Athlon 64 X2 5000+ comes in 1.5% more expensive on MSRP at $136 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 20 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium Dual Core SU4100 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.0% in the shared gaming data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium Dual Core SU4100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon 64 X2 5000+

    The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,425 points. Launch price was $149.

    Intel

    Pentium Dual Core SU4100

    The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,409 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Pentium Dual Core SU4100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5000+. The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ scores 1,425 against the Pentium Dual Core SU4100's 1,409 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5000+.

    FeatureAthlon 64 X2 5000+Pentium Dual Core SU4100
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2.6 GHz+100%
    1.3 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    2 MB+300%
    Process
    90 nm
    45 nm-50%
    Architecture
    Windsor (2006−2007)
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    PassMark
    1,425+1%
    1,409
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon 64 X2 5000+Pentium Dual Core SU4100
    Socket
    AM2
    BGA956
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-800
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ was priced at $136, while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($136 vs $134), Pentium Dual Core SU4100 was $2 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 10.5 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 — making the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 the 0.4% better value option.

    FeatureAthlon 64 X2 5000+Pentium Dual Core SU4100
    MSRP
    $136
    $134-1%
    Performance per Dollar
    10.5
    10.5
    Release Date
    2006
    2009

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.