Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Xeon E3-1220L v3

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Xeon E3-1220L v3 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

2 / 2

1,425

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E3-1220L v3

2 / 4

1,407

0.0%

Celeron B820

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Xeon E3-1220L v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Xeon E3-1220L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $57 less on MSRP ($136 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($136 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1220L v3, which brings 2 cores / 4 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
❌456.3% higher power demand at 89W vs 16W.

Xeon E3-1220L v3

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 2 cores / 4 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅Draws 16W instead of 89W, a 73W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 64 X2 5000+ across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,407 vs 1,425).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $136 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 X2 5000+ better than Xeon E3-1220L v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1220L v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.4% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 X2 5000+ comes in $57 cheaper on MSRP at $136 MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 43.7% better value on MSRP (10.5 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1220L v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Xeon E3-1220L v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+

The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,425 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1220L v3

The Xeon E3-1220L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,407 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1220L v3's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ versus 1.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220L v3 — a 53.7% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5000+. The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ scores 1,425 against the Xeon E3-1220L v3's 1,407 — a 1.3% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5000+. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs 4096 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1220L v3.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5000+	Xeon E3-1220L v3
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+73%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4096 kB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	90 nm	22 nm-76%
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,425+1%	1,407

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon E3-1220L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E3-1220L v3 — the Xeon E3-1220L v3 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E3-1220L v3 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+) vs 16 (Xeon E3-1220L v3) — the Xeon E3-1220L v3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+) and C222,C224,C226 (Xeon E3-1220L v3).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5000+	Xeon E3-1220L v3
Socket	AM2	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3-1600+100%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5000+) / VT-P (Xeon E3-1220L v3).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5000+	Xeon E3-1220L v3
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-P

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ was priced at $136, while the Xeon E3-1220L v3 came in at $193. On launch pricing ($136 vs $193), Athlon 64 X2 5000+ was $57 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1220L v3 — making the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ the 35.9% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5000+	Xeon E3-1220L v3
MSRP	$136-30%	$193
Performance per Dollar	10.5+44%	7.3
Release Date	2006	2013

Search Athlon 64 X2 5000+ on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1220L v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.