Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs Core i3-530
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Core i3-530
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is positioned at rank 1082 and the Core i3-530 is on rank 933, so the Core i3-530 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-530
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 5200+ | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 5200+ | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Core i3-530
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,505 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i3-530
The Core i3-530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,516 points. Launch price was $60.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-530's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ versus 0.93 GHz on the Core i3-530 — a 97.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5200+. The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i3-530 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ scores 1,505 against the Core i3-530's 1,516 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-530. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-530.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5200+ | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+190% | 0.93 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2.93 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 90 nm | 32 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Windsor (2006−2007) | Clarkdale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,505 | 1,516 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-530 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5200+ | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ launched at $420 MSRP, while the Core i3-530 debuted at $113. At current prices ($15 vs $15), the Core i3-530 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ delivers 100.3 pts/$ vs 101.1 pts/$ for the Core i3-530 — making the Core i3-530 the 0.7% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5200+ | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $420 | $113-73% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.3 | 101.1 |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Core i3-530
