Athlon 64 X2 5200+
VS
Core i5-4210Y

Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs Core i5-4210Y

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5200+

2 Cores2 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Core i5-4210Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is positioned at rank 1082 and the Core i5-4210Y is on rank 218, so the Core i5-4210Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
87071%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
82274%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
59737%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
17996%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
14255%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
12470%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7142%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7049%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
6418%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
6418%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
6346%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6175%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6089%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6064%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6009%
#1081
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
100%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
100%
#1083
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
99%
#1084
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
97%
#1085
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
96%
#1086
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
93%
#1087
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
92%
#1088
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
92%
#1089
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
92%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
91%
#1091
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
91%
#1092
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
90%
#1093
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
86%
#1094
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
84%
#1095
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
79%
#1096
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4210Y

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#205
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
384%
#206
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
378%
#207
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
347%
#208
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
345%
#209
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
342%
#211
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
330%
#212
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
317%
#213
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
316%
#214
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
308%
#218
Core i5-4210Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-4210Y (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon 64 X2 5200+Core i5-4210Y
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (2006) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon 64 X2 5200+Core i5-4210Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Core i5-4210Y

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5200+

The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,505 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-4210Y

The Core i5-4210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,530 points. Launch price was $297.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4210Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-4210Y — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5200+. The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i5-4210Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ scores 1,505 against the Core i5-4210Y's 1,530 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i5-4210Y. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4210Y.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 5200+Core i5-4210Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+42%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB
L2 Cache
512K
512 kB
Process
90 nm
22 nm-76%
Architecture
Windsor (2006−2007)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,505
1,530+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
580
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-4210Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4210Y — the Core i5-4210Y supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5200+) vs 12 (Core i5-4210Y) — the Core i5-4210Y offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5200+) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4210Y).

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 5200+Core i5-4210Y
Socket
AM2
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
DDR3L-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5200+) / VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4210Y). The Core i5-4210Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4200), while the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4210Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Core i5-4210Y rivals A4-6210.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 5200+Core i5-4210Y
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Tablet/2-in-1