Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Celeron N3010

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Celeron N3010 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

2 / 2

775

+5.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N3010

2 / 2

735

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Celeron N3010 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Celeron N3010: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 88.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 6.9 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 4W, a 3W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3010 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron N3010

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (735 vs 775).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌300% higher power demand at 4W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 better than Celeron N3010?

Yes. Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 5.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 comes in $47 cheaper on MSRP at $60 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 88.0% better value on MSRP (12.9 vs 6.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3010 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Celeron N3010 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron N3010

The Celeron N3010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 735 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Celeron N3010 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 versus 2.24 GHz on the Celeron N3010 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Celeron N3010. The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 uses the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron N3010 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 scores 775 against the Celeron N3010's 735 — a 5.3% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 TK-42	Celeron N3010
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.24 GHz+40%
Base Clock	—	1.04 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	65 nm	14 nm-78%
Architecture	Tyler (2007−2009)	Airmont (2016)
PassMark	775+5%	735

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N3010 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 versus 1600 on the Celeron N3010 — the Celeron N3010 supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 TK-42) vs 4 (Celeron N3010) — the Celeron N3010 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD S1 (Athlon 64 X2 TK-42) and Braswell (Celeron N3010).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 TK-42	Celeron N3010
Socket	S1	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	1600+140%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 TK-42) / true (Celeron N3010). The Celeron N3010 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3010 targets Budget Mobile.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 TK-42	Celeron N3010
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel HD Graphics 400
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	true
Target Use	—	Budget Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 was priced at $60, while the Celeron N3010 came in at $107. On launch pricing ($60 vs $107), Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 was $47 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 6.9 pts/$ for the Celeron N3010 — making the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 the 61.1% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 TK-42	Celeron N3010
MSRP	$60-44%	$107
Performance per Dollar	12.9+87%	6.9
Release Date	2009	2016

Search Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 on Amazon

Search Celeron N3010 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.