
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

Pentium T3400
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Pentium T3400 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Pentium T3400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Pentium T3400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium T3400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (775 vs 845).
Pentium T3400
2008Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium T3400 better than Athlon 64 X2 TK-42?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Pentium T3400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium T3400
The Pentium T3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 845 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is built on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 scores 775 against the Pentium T3400's 845 — a 8.6% lead for the Pentium T3400.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 | Pentium T3400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 2.16 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | — |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Tyler (2007−2009) | — |
| PassMark | 775 | 845+9% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T3400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 | Pentium T3400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 was priced at $60, while the Pentium T3400 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($60 vs $150), Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 was $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Pentium T3400 — making the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 the 78.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 | Pentium T3400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-60% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9+130% | 5.6 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















