Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Pentium U5600

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium U5600

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Pentium U5600 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Pentium U5600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Pentium U5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $40 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 54.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Draws 1W instead of 18W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium U5600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (775 vs 835).

Pentium U5600

2011

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • 1700% higher power demand at 18W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium U5600 better than Athlon 64 X2 TK-42?
Yes. Pentium U5600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 7.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Pentium U5600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium U5600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium U5600 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium U5600 comes in 66.7% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 54.7% better value on paper (12.9 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on S1.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium U5600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Pentium U5600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Pentium U5600

The Pentium U5600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 835 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Pentium U5600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 versus 1.33 GHz on the Pentium U5600 — a 18.4% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42. The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 uses the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium U5600 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 scores 775 against the Pentium U5600's 835 — a 7.5% lead for the Pentium U5600.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 TK-42Pentium U5600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz+20%
1.33 GHz
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB
256K (per core)+25500%
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Tyler (2007−2009)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
775
835+8%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium U5600 uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 TK-42Pentium U5600
Socket
S1
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 was priced at $60, while the Pentium U5600 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($60 vs $100), Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 was $40 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the Pentium U5600 — making the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 the 42.9% better value option.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 TK-42Pentium U5600
MSRP
$60-40%
$100
Performance per Dollar
12.9+55%
8.3
Release Date
2009
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.