Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
VS
E1-7010

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs E1-7010

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2009
VS
AMD

E1-7010

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is positioned at rank 1019 and the E1-7010 is on rank 949, so the E1-7010 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

#1007
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2271%
#1008
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2238%
#1009
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2054%
#1010
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2045%
#1011
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2026%
#1013
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1957%
#1014
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1876%
#1015
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1873%
#1016
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1823%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
99%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
98%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
97%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
96%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
96%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
95%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E1-7010

#936
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1789%
#937
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1763%
#938
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1618%
#939
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1611%
#940
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1596%
#942
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1541%
#943
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1478%
#944
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1476%
#945
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1436%
#948
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#949
E1-7010
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#950
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#953
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
99%
#955
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#958
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#959
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
97%
#962
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E1-7010 (2015) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3L-1333, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon 64 X2 TK-42E1-7010
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Tyler (2007−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo-L (2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 (2009) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon 64 X2 TK-42E1-7010
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and E1-7010

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

E1-7010

The E1-7010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 820 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and E1-7010 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 versus 1.5 GHz on the E1-7010 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42. The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 uses the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the E1-7010 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 scores 775 against the E1-7010's 820 — a 5.6% lead for the E1-7010.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 TK-42E1-7010
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz+7%
1.5 GHz
L2 Cache
1 MB
1024 kB
Process
65 nm
28 nm-57%
Architecture
Tyler (2007−2009)
Carrizo-L (2015)
PassMark
775
820+6%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E1-7010 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 TK-42E1-7010
Socket
S1
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0