
Athlon II P360

Athlon II X4 605e
Athlon II P360 vs Athlon II X4 605e Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II P360 vs Athlon II X4 605e FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II P360 vs Athlon II X4 605e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II P360
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $83 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $143 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $143 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,946 vs 1,964).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 605e.
Athlon II X4 605e
2009Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike Athlon II P360.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($143 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X4 605e better than Athlon II P360?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II P360 vs Athlon II X4 605e Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II P360
The Athlon II P360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,946 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon II X4 605e
The Athlon II X4 605e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,964 points. Launch price was $102.
Processing Power
The Athlon II P360 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X4 605e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 605e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Athlon II P360 versus 2.3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 605e — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon II P360 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X4 605e uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II P360 scores 1,946 against the Athlon II X4 605e's 1,964 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon II X4 605e.
| Feature | Athlon II P360 | Athlon II X4 605e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Champlain (2010−2011) | Propus (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,946 | 1,964 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,140 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,069 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II P360 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X4 605e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Athlon II P360 versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 605e — the Athlon II X4 605e supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X4 605e supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II P360) vs 16 (Athlon II X4 605e) — the Athlon II X4 605e offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: S1g4 (Athlon II P360) and 760G,785G,790GX,880G,890GX (Athlon II X4 605e).
| Feature | Athlon II P360 | Athlon II X4 605e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g4 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066 | DDR3-1333+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II P360) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X4 605e). Primary use case: Athlon II X4 605e targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II P360 rivals Pentium P6000.
| Feature | Athlon II P360 | Athlon II X4 605e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II P360 was priced at $60, while the Athlon II X4 605e came in at $143. On launch pricing ($60 vs $143), Athlon II P360 was $83 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II P360 delivers 32.4 pts/$ vs 13.7 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 605e — making the Athlon II P360 the 81% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II P360 | Athlon II X4 605e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-58% | $143 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.4+136% | 13.7 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















