Athlon II P360 vs Core i5-3439Y

Athlon II P360 vs Core i5-3439Y Performance Spectrum

Athlon II P360

2 / 2

1,946

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-3439Y

2 / 4

1,957

+0.6%

Pentium Extreme Edition 955

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II P360 vs Core i5-3439Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II P360 vs Core i5-3439Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II P360

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,946 vs 1,957).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while Core i5-3439Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3439Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-3439Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Athlon II P360 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3439Y better than Athlon II P360?

Yes. Core i5-3439Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3439Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3439Y is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-3439Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II P360 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (32.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on S1g4.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3439Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II P360 vs Core i5-3439Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II P360

The Athlon II P360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,946 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-3439Y

The Core i5-3439Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,957 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II P360 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-3439Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Athlon II P360 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-3439Y — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon II P360 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-3439Y uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II P360 scores 1,946 against the Core i5-3439Y's 1,957 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-3439Y.

Feature	Athlon II P360	Core i5-3439Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,946	1,957
Geekbench 6 Single	—	472
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	966

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II P360 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3439Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Athlon II P360 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-3439Y — the Core i5-3439Y supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-3439Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II P360) vs 16 (Core i5-3439Y) — the Core i5-3439Y offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: S1g4 (Athlon II P360) and 7-series (Core i5-3439Y).

Feature	Athlon II P360	Core i5-3439Y
Socket	S1g4	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1066	DDR3L-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II P360) vs VT-x (Core i5-3439Y). The Core i5-3439Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Athlon II P360 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3439Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II P360 rivals Pentium P6000; Core i5-3439Y rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.