Athlon II P360 vs Core i5-2415M

Athlon II P360 vs Core i5-2415M Performance Spectrum

Athlon II P360

2 / 2

1,946

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-2415M

2 / 4

1,933

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II P360 vs Core i5-2415M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II P360 vs Core i5-2415M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II P360

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while Core i5-2415M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2415M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-2415M

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Athlon II P360 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II P360 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,933 vs 1,946).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II P360 better than Core i5-2415M?

Yes. Athlon II P360 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II P360 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II P360 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II P360 is the better buy right now. Athlon II P360 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (32.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-2415M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II P360 vs Core i5-2415M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II P360

The Athlon II P360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,946 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-2415M

The Core i5-2415M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,933 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II P360 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-2415M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Athlon II P360 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-2415M — a 23.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-2415M. The Athlon II P360 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-2415M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II P360 scores 1,946 against the Core i5-2415M's 1,933 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon II P360.

Feature	Athlon II P360	Core i5-2415M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.9 GHz+26%
Base Clock	—	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,946	1,933

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II P360 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2415M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Athlon II P360 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2415M — the Core i5-2415M supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-2415M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II P360) vs 16 (Core i5-2415M) — the Core i5-2415M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Athlon II P360	Core i5-2415M
Socket	S1g4	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1066	DDR3-1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II P360) vs VT-x (Core i5-2415M). The Core i5-2415M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Athlon II P360 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2415M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Athlon II P360 rivals Pentium P6000.