Athlon II X2 240 vs Xeon 5110

Athlon II X2 240 vs Xeon 5110 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 240

2 / 2

1,060

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon 5110

2 / 2

1,055

0.0%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 240 vs Xeon 5110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 240 vs Xeon 5110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 240

2009

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike Xeon 5110.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while Xeon 5110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon 5110

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,055 vs 1,060).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 240.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 240 better than Xeon 5110?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 5110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon II X2 240 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X2 240 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 75% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X2 240 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 240 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 240 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II X2 240 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 240 vs Xeon 5110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 240

The Athlon II X2 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,060 points. Launch price was $35.

Xeon 5110

The Xeon 5110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $20.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 240 and Xeon 5110 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240 versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon 5110 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Athlon II X2 240 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon 5110 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 240 scores 1,060 against the Xeon 5110's 1,055 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II X2 240. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240	Xeon 5110
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+75%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+75%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Woodcrest (2006)
PassMark	1,060	1,055
Geekbench 6 Single	373	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	700	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 240 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 5110 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240	Xeon 5110
Socket	AM3	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 240) / not specified (Xeon 5110). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 240 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240 rivals Pentium E5400.