Athlon II X2 245e
Celeron 1005M
Athlon II X2 245e vs Celeron 1005M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 245e vs Celeron 1005M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 245e vs Celeron 1005M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 245e
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌1.2% HIGHER MSRP$87 MSRPvs$86 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1005M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Celeron 1005M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Athlon II X2 245e needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X2 245e across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (607 vs 741).
- ❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 245e better than Celeron 1005M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 245e vs Celeron 1005M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon II X2 245e
The Athlon II X2 245e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,141 points. Launch price was $80.
Celeron 1005M
The Celeron 1005M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $86.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 245e and Celeron 1005M share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245e versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 1005M — a 41.7% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245e (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Athlon II X2 245e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 1005M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 245e scores 1,141 against the Celeron 1005M's 1,116 — a 2.2% lead for the Athlon II X2 245e. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 319 vs 350, a 9.3% lead for the Celeron 1005M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 741 vs 607 (19.9% advantage for the Athlon II X2 245e). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 245e vs 2 MB on the Celeron 1005M.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245e | Celeron 1005M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz+53% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+53% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,141+2% | 1,116 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 656 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 319 | 350+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 741+22% | 607 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 245e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 1005M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 245e versus DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1005M — the Celeron 1005M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1005M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: 760G,770,780G,785G,790FX,790GX (Athlon II X2 245e) and HM76,HM77 (Celeron 1005M).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245e | Celeron 1005M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1600+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 245e) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 1005M). The Celeron 1005M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Athlon II X2 245e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 245e targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 245e rivals Athlon II X2 270u.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245e | Celeron 1005M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 245e was priced at $87, while the Celeron 1005M came in at $86. On launch pricing ($87 vs $86), Celeron 1005M was $1 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 245e delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the Celeron 1005M — making the Athlon II X2 245e the 1.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245e | Celeron 1005M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $87 | $86-1% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1 | 13.0 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X2 245e and Celeron 1005M
