Athlon II X2 245e
Celeron G460
Athlon II X2 245e vs Celeron G460 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 245e vs Celeron G460 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 245e vs Celeron G460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 245e
2010Why buy it
- ✅+6.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,141 vs 1,145).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($87 MSRP vs $37 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G460 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Celeron G460
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($37 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.9 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($37 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 319).
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G460 better than Athlon II X2 245e?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 245e vs Celeron G460 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon II X2 245e
The Athlon II X2 245e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,141 points. Launch price was $80.
Celeron G460
The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X2 245e packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G460 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X2 245e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245e versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 — a 46.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245e (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Athlon II X2 245e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G460 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 245e scores 1,141 against the Celeron G460's 1,145 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G460. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 319 vs 300, a 6.1% lead for the Athlon II X2 245e that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 245e vs 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245e | Celeron G460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz+61% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+61% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,141 | 1,145 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 319+6% | 300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 741 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 245e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G460 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 245e versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G460 — the Athlon II X2 245e supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G460 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: 760G,770,780G,785G,790FX,790GX (Athlon II X2 245e) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G460).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245e | Celeron G460 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+25% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 245e) vs VT-x (Celeron G460). The Celeron G460 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Athlon II X2 245e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 245e targets Budget, Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 245e rivals Athlon II X2 270u; Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245e | Celeron G460 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 245e was priced at $87, while the Celeron G460 came in at $37. On launch pricing ($87 vs $37), Celeron G460 was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 245e delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 30.9 pts/$ for the Celeron G460 — making the Celeron G460 the 80.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245e | Celeron G460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $87 | $37-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1 | 30.9+136% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X2 245e and Celeron G460
