A6 Micro-6500T vs Athlon II X2 245e

A6 Micro-6500T vs Athlon II X2 245e Performance Spectrum

A6 Micro-6500T

4 / 4

1,146

+0.4%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X2 245e

2 / 2

1,141

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 Micro-6500T vs Athlon II X2 245e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 Micro-6500T vs Athlon II X2 245e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 Micro-6500T

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 45W, a 40W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R4, while Athlon II X2 245e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.5 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).

Athlon II X2 245e

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $13 less on MSRP ($87 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 11.5 PassMark/$ ($87 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,141 vs 1,146).
❌800% higher power demand at 45W vs 5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6 Micro-6500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6 Micro-6500T better than Athlon II X2 245e?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X2 245e is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A6 Micro-6500T pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6 Micro-6500T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6 Micro-6500T is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6 Micro-6500T comes in 14.9% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $87 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. Athlon II X2 245e only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 14.4% better value on paper (13.1 vs 11.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6 Micro-6500T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6 Micro-6500T vs Athlon II X2 245e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6 Micro-6500T

The A6 Micro-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,146 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon II X2 245e

The Athlon II X2 245e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,141 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6 Micro-6500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X2 245e offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6 Micro-6500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the A6 Micro-6500T versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245e — a 46.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245e (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A6 Micro-6500T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X2 245e uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Micro-6500T scores 1,146 against the Athlon II X2 245e's 1,141 — a 0.4% lead for the A6 Micro-6500T.

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Athlon II X2 245e
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.9 GHz+61%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.9 GHz+142%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+100%	1 MB
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Mullins (2014)	Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark	1,146	1,141
Geekbench 6 Single	—	319
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	741

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 Micro-6500T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X2 245e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A6 Micro-6500T) vs 2 (Athlon II X2 245e). Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6 Micro-6500T) and 760G,770,780G,785G,790FX,790GX (Athlon II X2 245e).

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Athlon II X2 245e
Socket	FT3	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6 Micro-6500T) / AMD-V (Athlon II X2 245e). The A6 Micro-6500T includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R4), while the Athlon II X2 245e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 245e targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 245e rivals Athlon II X2 270u.

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Athlon II X2 245e
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon R4	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6 Micro-6500T was priced at $100, while the Athlon II X2 245e came in at $87. On launch pricing ($100 vs $87), Athlon II X2 245e was $13 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6 Micro-6500T delivers 11.5 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 245e — making the Athlon II X2 245e the 13.5% better value option.

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Athlon II X2 245e
MSRP	$100	$87-13%
Performance per Dollar	11.5	13.1+14%
Release Date	2014	2010

Search A6 Micro-6500T on Amazon

Search Athlon II X2 245e on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.