Athlon II X2 260u vs A6-7000
Athlon II X2 260u
A6-7000
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X2 260u is positioned at rank 873 and the A6-7000 is on rank 1081, so the Athlon II X2 260u offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 260u
Performance Per Dollar A6-7000
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X2 260u | A6-7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X2 260u | A6-7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+48%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 260u and A6-7000
Athlon II X2 260u
The Athlon II X2 260u is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 990 points. Launch price was $83.
A6-7000
The A6-7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $70.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 260u and A6-7000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 260u versus 3 GHz on the A6-7000 — a 50% clock advantage for the A6-7000. The Athlon II X2 260u uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the A6-7000 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 260u scores 990 against the A6-7000's 1,002 — a 1.2% lead for the A6-7000.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 260u | A6-7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3 GHz+67% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1024 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 28 nm-38% |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 990 | 1,002+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 260u uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A6-7000 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 260u versus 1600 on the A6-7000 — the A6-7000 supports 18.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon II X2 260u) vs 1 (A6-7000). PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 260u) vs 16 (A6-7000) — the A6-7000 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 260u) and FP3 (A6-7000).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 260u | A6-7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | FT3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | 1600+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The A6-7000 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4 Graphics), while the Athlon II X2 260u requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 260u rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400; A6-7000 rivals Pentium 3556U.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 260u | A6-7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon R4 Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X2 260u launched at $60 MSRP, while the A6-7000 debuted at $100. At current prices ($10 vs $15), the Athlon II X2 260u is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 260u delivers 99.0 pts/$ vs 66.8 pts/$ for the A6-7000 — making the Athlon II X2 260u the 38.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 260u | A6-7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-40% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 99.0+48% | 66.8 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X2 260u and A6-7000
