Athlon II X2 270 vs A4-6300B
Athlon II X2 270
A4-6300B
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X2 270 is positioned at rank 825 and the A4-6300B is on rank 745, so the A4-6300B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 270
Performance Per Dollar A4-6300B
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X2 270 | A4-6300B |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X2 270 | A4-6300B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 270 and A4-6300B
Athlon II X2 270
The Athlon II X2 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $100.
A4-6300B
The A4-6300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,328 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 270 and A4-6300B share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270 versus 3.9 GHz on the A4-6300B — a 13.7% clock advantage for the A4-6300B (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Athlon II X2 270 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the A4-6300B uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 270 scores 1,333 against the A4-6300B's 1,328 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon II X2 270. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 392 vs 415, a 5.7% lead for the A4-6300B that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270 | A4-6300B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (total) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Richland (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 1,333 | 1,328 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 392 | 415+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 686 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 270 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A4-6300B uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 270 versus DDR3-1600 on the A4-6300B — the Athlon II X2 270 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-6300B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 270) vs 16 (A4-6300B) — the A4-6300B offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 270) and A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4-6300B).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270 | A4-6300B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+44333% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 32 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 270) vs AMD-V (A4-6300B). The A4-6300B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8370D), while the Athlon II X2 270 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6300B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 270 rivals Pentium E6700; A4-6300B rivals Pentium G3240.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270 | A4-6300B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon HD 8370D |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Business Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X2 270 and A4-6300B
