Athlon II X3 450 vs Pentium Gold 4425Y

AMD

Athlon II X3 450

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium Gold 4425Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II X3 450 vs Pentium Gold 4425Y Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X3 450 vs Pentium Gold 4425Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X3 450 vs Pentium Gold 4425Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X3 450

2010

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike Pentium Gold 4425Y.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $87 MSRP, while Pentium Gold 4425Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium Gold 4425Y

2017

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X3 450 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (1,854 vs 1,865).
    • 438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X3 450.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon II X3 450 better than Pentium Gold 4425Y?
    Yes. Athlon II X3 450 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X3 450 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X3 450 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon II X3 450 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X3 450 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $87 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium Gold 4425Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Athlon II X3 450 vs Pentium Gold 4425Y Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon II X3 450

    The Athlon II X3 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,865 points. Launch price was $45.

    Intel

    Pentium Gold 4425Y

    The Pentium Gold 4425Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,854 points. Launch price was $161.

    Processing Power

    The Athlon II X3 450 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Pentium Gold 4425Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X3 450 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Athlon II X3 450 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium Gold 4425Y — a 61.2% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 450 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Athlon II X3 450 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium Gold 4425Y uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 450 scores 1,865 against the Pentium Gold 4425Y's 1,854 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X3 450. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 450 vs 2 MB on the Pentium Gold 4425Y.

    FeatureAthlon II X3 450Pentium Gold 4425Y
    Cores / Threads
    3 / 3+50%
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    3.2 GHz+88%
    1.7 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.2 GHz+88%
    1.7 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    2 MB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB (per core)
    512 kB
    Process
    45 nm
    14 nm-69%
    Architecture
    Rana (2009−2011)
    Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
    PassMark
    1,865
    1,854
    Geekbench 6 Single
    380
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    980
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon II X3 450 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Gold 4425Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon II X3 450Pentium Gold 4425Y
    Socket
    AM3
    FCBGA1515
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1333
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X3 450) / not specified (Pentium Gold 4425Y). Primary use case: Athlon II X3 450 targets Desktop.

    FeatureAthlon II X3 450Pentium Gold 4425Y
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    Desktop