Athlon II X4 600e vs Celeron G1840

Athlon II X4 600e vs Celeron G1840 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X4 600e

4 / 4

1,795

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G1840

2 / 2

1,784

0.0%

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 600e vs Celeron G1840 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 600e vs Celeron G1840: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 600e

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 50W, a 5W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G1840.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.9 vs 51.0 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1840 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron G1840

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $65 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 184.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.0 vs 17.9 PassMark/$ ($35 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Athlon II X4 600e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,784 vs 1,795).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 600e.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1840 better than Athlon II X4 600e?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1840 is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 600e pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 600e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1840 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1840 comes in $65 cheaper on MSRP at $35 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Athlon II X4 600e is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 184.0% better value on MSRP (51.0 vs 17.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1840 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X4 600e vs Celeron G1840 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 600e

The Athlon II X4 600e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,795 points. Launch price was $130.

Celeron G1840

The Celeron G1840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,784 points. Launch price was $53.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X4 600e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G1840 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 600e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II X4 600e versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1840 — a 24% clock advantage for the Celeron G1840 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Athlon II X4 600e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G1840 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 600e scores 1,795 against the Celeron G1840's 1,784 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X4 600e. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 600e vs 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1840.

Feature	Athlon II X4 600e	Celeron G1840
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.8 GHz+27%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Propus (2009−2011)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,795	1,784
Geekbench 6 Single	—	488
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	832

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 600e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1840 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G1840 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Socket AM3 (Athlon II X4 600e) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1840).

Feature	Athlon II X4 600e	Celeron G1840
Socket	AM3	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 600e) vs VT-x (Celeron G1840). The Celeron G1840 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Athlon II X4 600e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1840 rivals Pentium G3240.

Feature	Athlon II X4 600e	Celeron G1840
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X4 600e was priced at $100, while the Celeron G1840 came in at $35. On launch pricing ($100 vs $35), Celeron G1840 was $65 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 600e delivers 17.9 pts/$ vs 51.0 pts/$ for the Celeron G1840 — making the Celeron G1840 the 95.8% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X4 600e	Celeron G1840
MSRP	$100	$35-65%
Performance per Dollar	17.9	51.0+185%
Release Date	2009	2014

Search Athlon II X4 600e on Amazon

Search Celeron G1840 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.