Athlon II X4 600e
Core i5-13400F
Athlon II X4 600e vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 600e vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Civilization VI
Athlon II X4 600e vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 600e
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $96 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,795 vs 25,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.9 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM3, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +404.0% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 611.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 17.9 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM3 and older memory support.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌96% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Athlon II X4 600e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 600e vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon II X4 600e
The Athlon II X4 600e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,795 points. Launch price was $130.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 600e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II X4 600e versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 70.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Athlon II X4 600e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 600e scores 1,795 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 173.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 600e vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 600e | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 10 / 16+150% |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+109% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 45 nm | Intel 7 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 1,795 | 25,029+1294% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 600e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 600e versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X4 600e) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket AM3 (Athlon II X4 600e) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 600e | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+260% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 192 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 600e) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 600e | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 600e was priced at $100, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($100 vs $196), Athlon II X4 600e was $96 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 600e delivers 17.9 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 150.7% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 600e | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-49% | $196 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.9 | 127.7+613% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X4 600e and Core i5-13400F
