Athlon II X4 605e vs Core i3-3220T

AMD

Athlon II X4 605e

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-3220T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II X4 605e vs Core i3-3220T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 605e vs Core i3-3220T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 605e vs Core i3-3220T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 605e

2009

Why buy it

  • +0.6% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $6 less on MSRP ($143 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 465).
  • 28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3220T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-3220T

2012

Why buy it

  • +55% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2500, while Athlon II X4 605e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,953 vs 1,964).
  • 4.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $149 MSRPvs$143 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-3220T better than Athlon II X4 605e?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-3220T is ahead with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 605e pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 605e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-3220T is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-3220T comes in 4.2% more expensive on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $143 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II X4 605e only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 4.8% better value on paper (13.7 vs 13.1 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-3220T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X4 605e vs Core i3-3220T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II X4 605e

The Athlon II X4 605e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,964 points. Launch price was $102.

Intel

Core i3-3220T

The Core i3-3220T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,953 points. Launch price was $201.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X4 605e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3220T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 605e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 605e versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-3220T — a 19.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-3220T (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Athlon II X4 605e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-3220T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 605e scores 1,964 against the Core i3-3220T's 1,953 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X4 605e. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 465, a 43.1% lead for the Core i3-3220T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 605e vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3220T.

FeatureAthlon II X4 605eCore i3-3220T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz+22%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz+22%
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Propus (2009−2011)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,964
1,953
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,140
Geekbench 6 Single
300
465+55%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,069
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 605e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3220T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 605e versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3220T — the Core i3-3220T supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 760G,785G,790GX,880G,890GX (Athlon II X4 605e) and B75,Z75,Z77,H77,Q75,Q77,H61,H67,P67,Z68 (Core i3-3220T).

FeatureAthlon II X4 605eCore i3-3220T
Socket
AM3
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 605e) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3220T). The Core i3-3220T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Athlon II X4 605e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X4 605e targets Desktop, Core i3-3220T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-3220T rivals A8-5500.

FeatureAthlon II X4 605eCore i3-3220T
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Desktop
Low Power Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X4 605e was priced at $143, while the Core i3-3220T came in at $149. On launch pricing ($143 vs $149), Athlon II X4 605e was $6 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 605e delivers 13.7 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Core i3-3220T — making the Athlon II X4 605e the 4.7% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II X4 605eCore i3-3220T
MSRP
$143-4%
$149
Performance per Dollar
13.7+5%
13.1
Release Date
2009
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.