Athlon II X4 605e
Core i5-2410M
Athlon II X4 605e vs Core i5-2410M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 605e vs Core i5-2410M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 605e vs Core i5-2410M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 605e
2009Why buy it
- ✅+17.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $82 less on MSRP ($143 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 58.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.7 vs 8.7 PassMark/$ ($143 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike Core i5-2410M.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 444).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2410M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-2410M
2011Why buy it
- ✅+48% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Athlon II X4 605e needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (913 vs 1,069).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.7 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $143 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 605e.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-2410M better than Athlon II X4 605e?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 605e vs Core i5-2410M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon II X4 605e
The Athlon II X4 605e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,964 points. Launch price was $102.
Core i5-2410M
The Core i5-2410M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,954 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 605e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-2410M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 605e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 605e versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-2410M — a 23.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-2410M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Athlon II X4 605e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-2410M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 605e scores 1,964 against the Core i5-2410M's 1,954 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II X4 605e. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 444, a 38.7% lead for the Core i5-2410M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,069 vs 913 (15.7% advantage for the Athlon II X4 605e). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 605e vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2410M.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 605e | Core i5-2410M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,964 | 1,954 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,140 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 300 | 444+48% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,069+17% | 913 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 605e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2410M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X4 605e supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 760G,785G,790GX,880G,890GX (Athlon II X4 605e) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i5-2410M).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 605e | Core i5-2410M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | 1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 605e) vs true (Core i5-2410M). The Core i5-2410M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Athlon II X4 605e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X4 605e targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2410M rivals AMD A8-3500M.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 605e | Core i5-2410M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 605e was priced at $143, while the Core i5-2410M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($143 vs $225), Athlon II X4 605e was $82 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 605e delivers 13.7 pts/$ vs 8.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-2410M — making the Athlon II X4 605e the 45.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 605e | Core i5-2410M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $143-36% | $225 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.7+57% | 8.7 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X4 605e and Core i5-2410M
