Athlon II X4 605e vs Core M-5Y71

Athlon II X4 605e vs Core M-5Y71 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X4 605e

4 / 4

1,964

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core M-5Y71

2 / 4

1,975

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 605e vs Core M-5Y71 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 605e vs Core M-5Y71: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 605e

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $138 less on MSRP ($143 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 95.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.7 vs 7.0 PassMark/$ ($143 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,964 vs 1,975).

Core M-5Y71

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X4 605e across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $143 MSRP).
❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 605e.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X4 605e better than Core M-5Y71?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X4 605e is ahead with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y71 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y71 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X4 605e is the better buy right now. Athlon II X4 605e comes in $138 cheaper on MSRP at $143 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core M-5Y71 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 95.4% better value on MSRP (13.7 vs 7.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core M-5Y71 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X4 605e vs Core M-5Y71 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 605e

The Athlon II X4 605e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,964 points. Launch price was $102.

Core M-5Y71

The Core M-5Y71 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,975 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X4 605e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core M-5Y71 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 605e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 605e versus 2.9 GHz on the Core M-5Y71 — a 23.1% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y71 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Athlon II X4 605e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core M-5Y71 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 605e scores 1,964 against the Core M-5Y71's 1,975 — a 0.6% lead for the Core M-5Y71. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 605e vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y71.

Feature	Athlon II X4 605e	Core M-5Y71
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.9 GHz+26%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+92%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Propus (2009−2011)	Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark	1,964	1,975
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,140	—
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,069	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 605e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core M-5Y71 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon II X4 605e	Core M-5Y71
Socket	AM3	FCBGA1234
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 605e) / not specified (Core M-5Y71). Primary use case: Athlon II X4 605e targets Desktop.

Feature	Athlon II X4 605e	Core M-5Y71
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X4 605e was priced at $143, while the Core M-5Y71 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($143 vs $281), Athlon II X4 605e was $138 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 605e delivers 13.7 pts/$ vs 7.0 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y71 — making the Athlon II X4 605e the 64.6% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X4 605e	Core M-5Y71
MSRP	$143-49%	$281
Performance per Dollar	13.7+96%	7.0
Release Date	2009	2014

Search Athlon II X4 605e on Amazon

Search Core M-5Y71 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.