Athlon II X4 635 vs Celeron G3930

The Athlon II X4 635 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3930 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 635 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X4 635 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3930 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Athlon II X4 635 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G3930 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 635 scores 2,248 against the Celeron G3930's 2,259 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G3930. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 750, a 122.6% lead for the Celeron G3930 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 550 vs 1,100 (66.7% advantage for the Celeron G3930). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 635 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930.

The Athlon II X4 635 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G3930 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 on the Athlon II X4 635 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930 — the Celeron G3930 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 770,785G,790FX,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Athlon II X4 635) and H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930).

Only the Athlon II X4 635 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 635) vs VT-x (Celeron G3930). The Celeron G3930 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Athlon II X4 635 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X4 635 targets Budget, Celeron G3930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930 rivals Pentium G4560.

At launch, the Athlon II X4 635 was priced at $400, while the Celeron G3930 came in at $42. On launch pricing ($400 vs $42), Celeron G3930 was $358 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 635 delivers 5.6 pts/$ vs 53.8 pts/$ for the Celeron G3930 — making the Celeron G3930 the 162.2% better value option.

Search Athlon II X4 635 on AmazonSearch Celeron G3930 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.